There is a movement developing currently that says it supports free speech, but.
This movement contradicts itself by supporting concurrently statements X and not X.
Hate speech is a common phrase used today to limit free speech. If you say something contrary to this movement, they will attempt to shut you down by referring to your speech as hate speech, and speech that incites violence.
This movement is expressed by a logical fallacy.
At the same time, there is an overlapping movement to protect victims proactively from having their feelings hurt.
These vicitmisers argue that free speech limits statements that "might" offend someone.
The problem with this movement is that if you can only say something that doesn't offend someone, you cannot say anything.
How is that freedom of speech?
No comments:
Post a Comment