India's Racist Caste System is Alive and Thriving in Australia

Most of us have never heard of the term and Indian practice of the Caste System.

The celebration of Indian "culture" in Australia seems to skip over this pervasive tradition.

Perhaps they don't want us to know about certain "cutlural" activities, as Australians currently only like to know things that are nice, cute and acceptable about foreign "culture".

We're not surprised.





The Indian Caste System is a way Indians divide their people into a hierarchy of groups based on the value they provide to their society, their communities.

You inherit your caste from your parents and pass it on to your children, whom you've had with a member of the same caste, thus preserving the caste.

Sound familiar?

A lower caste is of inferior value to a superior caste. The castes therefore do not inter-marry, mix socially or treat each other equally.





The castes begin the division into basic social service provision: from religious elite and academics, royalty and warriors at the top, to business owners, executives, landowners, professionals, and then down to workers, labourers, servants at the bottom.

Beneath the bottom are "out-castes". The lowest of the low, those who perform the disgusting services no one else wants to do: cleaners, street sweapers etc.

These few fundamental types of castes are further divided internally, so that each caste type has its own sub-castes, which themselves divide, based on nuanced changes.



Have you ever used or heard the term "out-caste"?

We bet you didn't know the significance of this term.

You are born, work, marry, live and die in your Caste.

A higher caste will not employ an Indian into a job outside their caste's designated job spectrum.

How Aussie is that?

What's your definition of racist?



Although, Australian Indians will not admit this practice occurs anymore, in Australia (in India only), or doesn't exist, all you need to do is look for yourself. Look closely. It's there alright. Alive and kicking.

And why shouldn't it be?

Here's a screenshot from an example of an Indian "matrimony" dating website:






Why would a first or second generation culture abandon it's most traditional, most fundamental beliefs and practices, just because they or their parents moved to another country?

What strongly patriotic and proud person would oppose and choose to weaken, dilute or abolish its own heartfelt, close-held  cultural tradition? Would you drop one of yours, just because others might not like it?

The Indian Caste System is just one example of the ancient human self-preserving tradition (perhaps instinct) of creating a Them and Us in any society.

Every "culture" has, or has had, some version of a caste system in their society, their "culture"

[I keep using speech marks for "culture" because the word actually means "development", which implies change, improvement, growth, all concepts that actually oppose the concept of tradition.
Most things of "culture" when discussing ethnic group characteristics, utterly lack any connotation or certainly denotation of the term "cutlure".  In this sociological sense, the term is a mysnomer if ever there was one.]

Jews, Chinese, Arabs, Fijians, most groups who feel an ethnic connection divide themselves internally or from outsiders, in order to strengthen that feeling of belonging and specialness.

There's nothing wrong with keeping tradition. But there's everything wrong in lieing to everyone, falsely presenting yourself as an inclusive group, and excluding one group infavour of another just because they don't belong to your group.

Not all Indians are racist in this way. Of course, not all Australians are inclusive. That's not the point. The exception of any group is not a problem. It's the rule of any group that we're concerned about.

Before you call an Aussie a racist, think again.

Halal food is Cut-Throat... literally

Halal food is that which adheres to Islamic law, as defined in the Koran. 

The Islamic form of slaughtering animals or poultry, involves killing the animal through a cut to the throat; jugular vein, carotid artery and windpipe. 

Animals must be alive and healthy at the time of slaughter and all blood is drained from the carcass.

The animal chokes on inhaling its own blood, before dying in pain, fear and confusion, and bleeding out.

Often, a traditional knife is used, often blunt, and the executioner has no hesitation in sawing through a tough neck if needed.

You won't learn that in school, or at multi-cultural festivals celebrating Islamic tradition.

How would you like to go through that?

If you support Halal food in any way, directly or indirectly, you support this sick, stupid, disgusting practice. 

Grow some balls, get a brain and examine the world around you closer than a mind-starved Kardashian fan.

With the Internet providing you the world's information and the sum collection of all human understanding at the click of a button, you have no excuse for not knowing what's really going on around you.

ARMED CITIZENS

Australians will soon be arming themselves against perceived threats from local Islamists. Policy makers and legislators need to start preparing for the strategic shock now.

The slow wave of shocking attacks by Islamists across the globe that we see almost weekly on our TVs, elicits a myriad of responses from stunned onlookers. One notable response is the sense of helplessness. It is immediately clear to many watching that should they experience such an attack themselves there is nothing they can do about it. Almost every attack may as well have been carried out in a kindergarten – the victims are that helpless. 

A chain of thought sparks in the minds of most of us watching the helpless victims from our armchairs. We see that no one from the law enforcement community is there to help. No patrols. No one comes to their rescue. Where are the police?

The obvious solution for many watching the defenceless killed in public, in broad daylight, without impediment, is to arm-up. All it takes is one or two examples in the media of an armed victim fighting back against the terrorists, and the floodgates will be opened. Australians everywhere will beg, borrow and steal to arm themselves, so they can feel safer walking the streets, taking the train to work, dropping the kids off at school and shopping in the malls.

The thought of being armed everywhere they go, will replace the job police are failing to fulfil, a sense of genuine security and safety. At last Joe and Jane Public won’t have to worry about adding yet another fear to their growing list of dangers from the community. 

The danger on the horizon is of much more concern to average Australians, as it is utterly new, they don’t really understand its nature, it seems incomprehensible, it’s a scary, ugly terror and they know the police can’t protect them. Being armed they are no longer helpless – in their mind. Knowing they can turn from victim into counter-attacker, shooting back, will become close to desirable in the minds of many, especially men.

No one wants them or their loved ones to die for some stupid, pointless reason at the hands of a religious idiot nut-case, just because they had nothing to fight back with.

Unlike the gun culture of the United States, Australia has spent decades with strict firearms restrictions that has produced generations[1] without any understanding of their power and their potential. In the States, firearms are not uncommonly used in the settling of disputes, such as road rage and family or neighbourhood arguments. However, most of these end at the presentation of the weapon or the firing of a warning shot; hardly a terrorist attack.

For Australia, the phenomenon will be a shock to the system, as there is no “real”[2] familiarity with firearms by almost all dwellers of Australia’s few cities. They have almost no appearance in the life of a city-dweller, and even on television they rarely feature outside fiction, only occasionally in the news, and never in lifestyle television outside the odd hunting programme that most viewers will flick past whilst channel surfing.

There is an unwritten social contract in the US, between its comparably more fire-arm familiarised citizens, that is effectively a self-regulation. You avoid certain situations and certain escalating arguments, because someone might have a gun. This self-regulation is more obvious in areas of high firearm ownership, such as the cities of Texas and the Mid-western cities, such as Colorado, Arizona, and Idaho, but applies across the country and is understood by most. The point here is that it is no use looking to the US as a model to follow in Australia; it’s chalk and cheese.

Australian policymakers and legislators need to consider the implications of a secretly armed citizenship. The widespread carriage of secreted fire-arms in public will imply more than its relatively innocuous intent.

What should we imagine when considering the evolution of road-rage, pub brawls, arguing neighbours? Will people start resolving disputes with their weapons? Will the threatening presentation of a fire-arm be used to curtail an escalating argument between citizens? Instead of relying on current recourses, such as the pointless arguing and futile paperwork handed to them by impotent police stations, the armed citizen will not even bother wasting their time with the police.  

What effect will an armed society have on the black and open marketplace for weapons? We should expect to see the typical abuse by the retail trade, as supply creates demand.

Will self-defence classes move from the Dojo to the pistol range?

The change will affect the law enforcement community, certainly, schooling, public transport, health, privacy, even taxation, but also the commercial sector: the security industry, the insurance industry, private healthcare, sport and recreation industries, and the black markets of weapon suppliers, criminal activity to fund supply, and organised crime.

The implications are legion, as are the number of questions needing answers, problems needing solutions, laws and policies needing drafting well before that first TV news item airs all over the country. “Neighbourhood argument, pub brawl, street party, road rage, school bullying… ends in shooting.”

---

[1] Terrorists are unlikely to attack the regional farming communities, where any firearm familiarisation in Australia is only found among those protecting their crops from predators and pests, or for game during hunting seasons. This article is therefore concerned only with communities of strategic interest to Islamist terrorists, and these are likely to be large cities rather than country towns.

[2] Excluding movies and crime drama television, as fictional representation is a poor preparation for the real thing when it comes to firearms.